POSITIVE VALUE OF COVID 19 PANDEMIC FOR MSMEs: A CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Sugiyanto Sugiyanto High School Village Development Community "APMD" Yogyakarta Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dewi Suma
  • Prayeki Prayeki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v4i03.1121

Abstract

The research entitled the positive value of the covid-19 pandemic for MSMEs in Yogyakarta City was motivated by the covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia, starting with the findings of Covid-19 sufferers on March 2, 2020 to April 18, 2020, 6,248 confirmed positive cases of Covid-19 with 631 recovered cases and 535 died cases. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Government has established various policies such as social distancing, PSBB, learning-working-worshiping at home. The impact of the policy was that various social, tourism and economic activities stagnated. The impact of this stagnation has an impact on MSME actors in general, including MSMEs in Yogyakarta. A qualitative research approach is a case study of MSME actors who are gathered in the home business camp (HBC) and Karang Mitra Usaha (KaMU) in Yogyakarta City. Data were collected through interviews via social media, observation and literature study. Qualitative data analysis used the Creswell 2016 technique. The conclusion of the research was that the reasons behind positive thinking for MSMEs as a result of the Covid-19 epidemic were religious, psychological and educational factors. So that MSME players can take lessons by innovating, evaluating business and developing creativity. Suggestions in research, this research needs to be continued with wider informance and post-Covid-19 MSME actors need to be strengthened through disaster management training for advanced creativity development, psychology, entrepreneurial religiosity and business philosophy. Keywords: positive value, COVID-19 pandemic, MSMEs Yogyakarta

References

Barron, F. 1976. The Psychology of Creativity. Dalam T.M New Comb (editor). Direction in Psychology. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston. Berenson.

Bunga, A dan Hermansyur, HM. 2017. Pengaruh Inovasi dan Kreativitas Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Pada UMKM Di Kota Medan. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi harapan Medan. Pusat Ilmu Pengetahuan Terbuka. DOI: 10.31219 / osf.io / ahxju

Creswell, J.W. 2016. Educational Research: Planning, counducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Merrill.

Davenport and Volpel. 2001. Intellectual Capital, Core Assets for the 3rd Millenium. Enterprise. International, The Rise of Knowledge Toward Attention.

Giddens, A., (1995). Constitution of Society: The Outline the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Guilford, J. P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https:// https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.

Haefele, John. W. 1962. “Creativity and Innovationâ€. New York: Reinhold. Publishing Corporation.

Isenberg, Joan. P and Marry Renck Jalongo. 1993. Creative Expression And Play In The Early Chilhood Curriculum. Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Canada.

Melanny M, Gogi.K, Rochim. A.S. 2018. Analisis Orentasi Pasar, Inovasi dan Kreativitas Terhadap Kinerja Pemasaran Pada UMKM Di Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal Dinamika Governance, Vol. 8 No. 2. UPN Jawa Timur.

Munandar. 1977. Creativity and Education. Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Rachmatsari, P. 2017. Kajian Kreativitas Dan Inovasi Pelaku Usaha Kecil Menegah (UKM) Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing UKM: studi kasus pada wanita pengusaha UKM dii bidang kuliner di kota Bandung. Universitas Pasudan, Bandung.

Reni Akbar-Hawadi dkk, 2001. Psikologi Perkembangan Anak Mengenai Sifat, Bakat dan Kemampuan Anak. GRASINDO, Jakarta.

Richardson, B. 1995. How to Administrate the Networked Organizational Tips from the Theory and Practice of Management. The Learning Organization. Bradford: 1995 vol. 2, Iss 1; pg; 15. http//proquest.umi.com.

Rogers, Everett M, 1995, Diffusions of Innovations, Forth Edition. New York: Tree Press.

Schaefer, D.W.F. 1999. Essencial of Contenporary Advertising. New York:MC. Graww Hill.

Sugiyanto dan Musoli. 2017. Pengembangan Kreativitas Sumberdaya Manusia Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah Dinas Koperasi Tenagakerja Dan Transmigrasi. Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implementasi,Vol. 8 No 2. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Tricahyadinata, I. 2013. Kapabilitas Inovasi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntabel. Vol. 10, No.1. Fakultas Ekonomi Univeritas Wulawarman.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah.

Utami Munandar, 2009. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Renika Cipta. Bandung.

Van de Ven. A.H. 1986. Central Problems in The management of innovation, Journal of Management Science (1986-1998): Vol32. No 5, May: ABI/INFORM Global pg.590, Posted in USA.

Verspagen, B. (1991). A new Empirical Approach to Catching up or Falling Behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2(2): 359–380.

Wallas. 1990. Theory Regarding Creativity. Book Company, USA., http://moethya26.wordpress.com// Inc., New. York. Yaws .

Yu-Lin Wang, Yau-De Wang, Ruey-Yun Horng. 2010. "Learning and innovation in small and medium enterprises", Journal Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 110 Iss: 2, pp.175-192.

Yin, R.K. 2015. Case Study Research: Design and Method. California. Thoussand Oaks: sage Publiscation Inc.

Zaltman, J. Duncan, R., and Holbeck, J. 1973. Innovation and Organization, New York: John Willey.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

Sugiyanto, S., Suma, D., & Prayeki, P. (2020). POSITIVE VALUE OF COVID 19 PANDEMIC FOR MSMEs: A CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 4(03). https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v4i03.1121

Citation Check