USABILITY ANALYSIS IN PAASAAR.COM APPLICATION USING THE SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS) APPROACH

Mohamad Rifqy Roosdhani, Jati Widagdo, Erika Ayu Amelia

Abstract

The development of internet use in Indonesia to do online shopping continues to show an increase. Usability and accessibility are core human concepts computer interaction (HCI). These concepts are intended to ensure effectiveness and satisfaction of the system to users. Usability is considered throughout the standard. It states that all interactive products will have a user interface, and the quality of the user interface can have significant effect on the achievement of user goals. Paasaar.com application is an e-commerce platform that can be accessed through a website which is addressed at paasaar.com. This research method is descriptive quantitative. Data collection is done by method of answering the questionnaire that has been standard used for the SUS method. Questionnaire distributed to 100 people respondents to fill directly questionnaires were selected randomly. By calculation using the SUS formula, it is obtained as shown in Table 1. Based on Table 1, the value of 83.88 is obtained. This value means that it is in the Good category. Good in this case is in terms of system usability. So that the e-commerce developed is in accordance with user expectations and is feasible to be used and accessed more widely.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdallah, S., & Jaleel, B. (2015). Website appeal: Development of an assessment tool and evaluation framework of e-marketing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 10(3), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762015000300005

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Barnum, C. M. (2020). Usability testing essentials: ready, set... test! Morgan Kaufmann.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.

Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A Retrospective. J. Usability Studies 8, 2 (Feb. 2013), 29–40.

Díaz, J., Rusu, C., & Collazos, C. A. (2017). Experimental validation of a set of cultural-oriented usability heuristics: e-Commerce websites evaluation. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 50, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.09.013

Ependi, U., Panjaitan, F., & Hutrianto, H. (2017). System Usability Scale Antarmuka Palembang Guide Sebagai Media Pendukung Asian Games XVIII. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 3(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.3.2.80-86

Fisk, A. D., Czaja, S. J., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., & Sharit, J. (2020). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.

Hamid, S., Bawany, N. Z., & Zahoor, K. (2020). Assessing ecommerce websites: Usability and accessibility study. 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2020, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS51025.2020.9263162

Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., & Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051

Jiwa Permana, A. A. (2019). Usability Testing Pada Website E-Commerce Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (Sus) (Studi Kasus : Umkmbuleleng.Com). JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.23887/jst-undiksha.v8i2.22858

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.

Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability: Preference vs. Performance. In Communications of the ACM (Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 66–75). https://doi.org/10.1145/175276.175282

Pressman, R. S. (2010). Interface Design. Software Engineering A Practitioner’s Approach 7th, McGraw-Hill Education.

Sivaji, A., & Soo, S. (2013). Understanding, Enhancing and Automating HCI Work Practices: Malaysian Case Studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97(January 2012), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.285

Wickens, C. D., Helton, W. S., Hollands, J. G., & Banbury, S. (2021). Engineering psychology and human performance. Routledge.

Widowati, H. (2019). Indonesia Jadi Negara dengan pertumbuhan e-commerce tercepat di dunia. Katadata. Co. Id.

Yildiz, A. E., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., Ercoskun, K., & Alten, S. (2014). A knowledge-based risk mapping tool for cost estimation of international construction projects. Automation in Construction, 43, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.