ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWITTER AS AN EWOM MEDIA (STUDY ON TENSAYAA'S GROUP ORDER)

Authors

  • Sekar Nathasya Hermawan Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Cecep Safa'atul Barkah Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Arianis Chan Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Pratami Wulan Tresna Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v6i1.3947

Abstract

Electronic word of mouth is a form of marketing with a high credibility because it comes from consumers who have experience with related products. Electronic word of mouth is also quite effective because one individual with another individual does not need to meet face to face and can be easily found on any media. The purpose of this research is to find out how effective Twitter is as an electronic word of mouth media for Tensayaa group order business and what marketing strategies are suitable to increase Tensayaa group order electronic word of mouth on Twitter. The method in this research is descriptive quantitative, with purposive sampling, where the population of this research is the Twitter followers of Tensayaa group order, and a sample of 227 respondents was found with the minimum determination of respondents is determined using the slovin formula. This research was also tested for validity, reliability, and descriptive statistics. The results of this research show that Twitter is an effective social media for conducting electronic word of mouth processes in the Tensayaa group order business by being reviewed through seven measurement dimensions.

References

Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1998). Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. Sage.

Bennett, L. (2012). Transformations through Twitter: The England riots, television viewership and negotiations of power through media convergence. Participations, 9(2), 511–525

Brogan, C. (2008). Fifty ways to use Twitter for business. Retrieved 2021, from http://socialcomputingmagazine.com/viewcolumn.cfm? colid=592

Cha, M. (2010). Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference, 16(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1879-3479.1978.tb00388.x

Darmawan, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS19. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring Motivations for Online Opinion Seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2006.10722114

Halim, J., Gunawan, R., & Yakub, S. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Loyalitas Pelanggan Terhadap Kartu Seluler Merek Telkomsel (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi ITMI Medan). Jurnal SAINTIKOM Vol. 16 No. 3, 235.

Hasan, Ali. (2010). Marketing dari Mulut ke Mulut, Yogyakarta

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

Jalilvand, M. R., Ebrahimi, A., & Samiei, N. (2013). Electronic Word of Mouth Effects on Tourists’ Attitudes Toward Islamic Destinations and Travel Intention: An Empirical Study in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81(2006), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.465

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

Kim, E., Sung, Y., & Kang, H. (2014). Brand followers’ retweeting behavior on Twitter: How brand relationships influence brand electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.020

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). A framework for marketing management. Sloan Management Review, 32, 94–104.

Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survai Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Lp3ES.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfbeta

Sutisna, (2012). Perilaku Konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran. Second Edition. Bandung

Sernovitz, A., Kawaski, G., & Godin, S. (2006). Word of mouth marketing. Dearborn Trade, A Kaplan Professional Company.

Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003

Zhang, B. J. J. and M. (2009). Twitter Power:Tweets as ElectronicWord of Mouth Bernard. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(July), 1852–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

Downloads

Published

2022-03-23

How to Cite

Hermawan, S. N., Barkah, C. S., Chan, A., & Tresna, P. W. (2022). ANALYZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWITTER AS AN EWOM MEDIA (STUDY ON TENSAYAA’S GROUP ORDER). International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(1), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v6i1.3947

Citation Check