PENGARUH WHISTLEBLOWING, DAN SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL TERHADAP PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN DENGAN RED FLAGS SEBAGAI PEMODERASI

Authors

  • Susi Sih Kusumawardhany Program Studi Akuntansi S1 Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Yunita Kurnia Shanti Program Studi Akuntansi S1 Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v10i2.19810

Abstract

This study aims to examine and obtain evidence regarding the influence of whistleblowing and professional skepticism on fraud detection, moderated by red flags, among auditors at the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Region IV, Central Jakarta. This quantitative study used primary data in the form of questionnaires distributed to respondents. The sample selection method used saturated sampling, resulting in 75 respondents and and 57 respondents were obtained as a sample that could be processed. Data analysis used SPSS version 24 along with the MRA test. Based on the data analysis, the results indicate that whistleblowing has no effect on fraud detection, and professional skepticism has effect on fraud detection. The MRA test results indicate, first, that red flags are unable to moderate the effect of whistleblowing on fraud detection, and second, that red flags are able to moderate the effect of professional skepticism on fraud detection.

 

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Kusumawardhany, S. S., & Shanti, Y. K. (2026). PENGARUH WHISTLEBLOWING, DAN SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL TERHADAP PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN DENGAN RED FLAGS SEBAGAI PEMODERASI. JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v10i2.19810

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check