Interaksi Infrastruktur Publik terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia

Penulis

  • Yusri Hazmi Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, Indonesia
  • Teuku Zulkarnain Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v7i2.9105

Abstrak

Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalsis interaksi infrastruktur public terhadap perekonomian Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan variable yang terdiri dari infrastruktur public, pendidikan, kesehatan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi. Dari hasil pengujian diperoleh infrastruktur secara parsial berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap PDRB. Peningkatan infrastruktur memberi pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan perekonomian. Untuk ini diperlukan upaya pembangunan infrastruktur yang merata dan tidak terpusat pada provinsi tertentu. Dengan demikian akan memberi pengaruh terhadap pemerataan pembangunan, peningkatan output barang dan jasa dan konsumsi masyarakat. Peningkatan infrastruktur juga meningkatkan kesempatan kerja dan pengurangan tingkat kemiskinan. Kualitas pendidikan secara parsial berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap PDRB. Peningkatan pendidikan tidak mengakibatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi. Hal ini seiring disebabkan pertumbuhan lapangan kerja tidak sebanding dengan pertumbuhan pendidikan. Dalam kondisi ini tingkat pengangguran, justru terjadi pada angka kerja berpendidikan tinggi. Kesehatan secara parsial berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap PDRB. Peningkatan kesehatan berpengaruh terhadap kesempatan bekerja, sehingga meningkatkan pendapatan. Peningkatan pendapatanmengakibatkan daya daya beli masyarakat tinggi. Sehingga memberi pengaru terhadap konsumsi out barang dan jasa. Dalam kondisi ini diperlukan kebijakan pemerintah terkait dengan pemerataan infrastruktur, yang berorientasi pada peningkatan kualitas pendidikan dan kesehatan, sehingga pertumbuhan ekonomi meningkat.

Referensi

Adair, T., Pardosi, J. F., Rao, C., Kosen, S., and Tarigan, I. U. (2012). Access to health services and early age mortality in Ende, Indonesia. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 79(5), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-011-0601-z

Awan, Abdul Ghafoor Awan and Vashma Anum. (2014). Impact Of Infrastructure Development On Economic Growth: A Case Study Of Pakistan. International Journal Of Development And Economic Development. Vol.2,No.5,Pp.1-15, December 2014

Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5–32.

Checchi, D. (2003). Inequality in incomes and access to education: A cross-country analysis (1960-95). Labour, 17(2), 153–201.

Cho, J. E., Seung, J., and Song, L. B. K. (2019). Mind the electoral gap: the effect of investment in public infrastructure on authoritarian support in South Korea. Studies in Comparative International Development, (03).

Cigu, E. Agheorghiesei, D.T. Gavriluta Vatamanu, A.F. and Toader, E. (2019). Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: ACase Study for the Eu-28 Countries. Sustainability, 11, 67.

Ciucu, Stefan Cristian and Dragoescu, Raluca. (2014). The Influence of Education on Economic Growth, Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 2(1), pages 243-257, May.

Crescenzi, R. and Rodríguez-Pose, (2012) A. Infrastructure and regional growth in the European Union. Pap. Reg. Sci., 91, 487–513.

Duflo, E. (2004). The medium run effects of educational expansion: Evidence from a large school construction program in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 74(1), 163–197.

Farhadi, M. (2015). Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 74, 73–90.

Kyriacou, A.P., Muinelo-Gallo, L. and Roca-Sagalé. (2019). The efï¬ciency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis. Transp. Policy 2019, 74, 93–102.

Mendoza, O. M. V. (2017). Infrastructure development, Income inequality and urban sustainability in the Republic of China. No. 713. Tokyo, Japan.

Mishra, A., and Agarwal, A. (2019). Do infrastructure development and urbanisation lead to rural-urban income inequality? Evidence from some Asian countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 11(2), 167–183.

Mishra, Satyabrata (2016). The New Theory of Economic Growth: Endogenous Growth Model. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 5 (9). PP:50-53

Murawski, L., and Church, R. L. (2009). Improving accessibility to rural health services: The maximal covering network improvement problem. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(2), 102–110.

Orazem, P. F., and King, E. M. (2007). Schooling in Developing Countries: The Roles of Supply, Demand and Government Policy. In Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3475–3559).

Solow, R. (1956) “A contribution to the theory of economic growthâ€, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, pp. 65-94

World Bank. (2018). Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle Overview. Washington.

Ye, X.; Ma, L., Ye, K., Chen, J. and Xie, Q. (2017). Analysis of Regional Inequality from Sectoral Structure, Spatial Policy and Economic Development: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 633.

Yıldırım, S., Yildirim, D.C. and Calıskan, H. (2020). The influence of health on economic growth from the perspective of sustainable development: a case of OECD countries, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-09-2019-007

Zhou, T. Tan, R. and Sedlin, T. (2018). Planning Modes for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Comparing China and Germany. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3401.

Diterbitkan

2023-06-01

Cara Mengutip

Hazmi, Y., & Zulkarnain, T. (2023). Interaksi Infrastruktur Publik terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v7i2.9105

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Citation Check