ANALISIS SENGKETA TRANSFER PRICING ATAS PEMBAYARAN ROYALTI KEPADA PIHAK AFILIASI TERKAIT PEMANFAATAN KNOW HOW

Ainun Uswatul Khasanah; Jasman Jasman

doi:10.29040/jap.v25i1.13082

ANALISIS SENGKETA TRANSFER PRICING ATAS PEMBAYARAN ROYALTI KEPADA PIHAK AFILIASI TERKAIT PEMANFAATAN KNOW HOW

Ainun Uswatul Khasanah, Jasman Jasman

Abstract

This research discusses transfer pricing policies regarding differences in views between Tax Authorities and Taxpayers on royalty payments made to affiliates in connection with the utilization of Intangible Property in the production process at manufacturing companies through a case study of Decision Number PUT-010351.15/2018/PP/M.XIIB Year 2020. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. The results of this research indicate that affiliate transactions in the form of royalty payments cannot be automatically considered as part of transfer pricing practices (profit shifting). Royalty payments to affiliates are considered reasonable or permissible if they have met the arm’s lenght principles. However, if the royalty payment transactions do not reflect the arm’s lenght principles and the utilization of intangible property cannot be proven, then payments to affiliates may be considered as tax avoidance practices. The key point in assessing whether there is tax avoidance practice is the need for preliminary testing and transfer pricing examination analysis regarding the utilization of intangible property in accordance with the prevailing tax regulations in Indonesia.

Keywords

Transfer Pricing, Royali, Intellectual Properti, Pajak Internasional, Banding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajzen, I (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Precess, 179-211.

Asnawi, Meinarni; Baridwan, Z. S. E. (2009). Analisis keputusan kepatuhan pajak: strategi audit random, Perceived Probability of Audit dan pemahaman etika pajak (Studi Eksperimen Laboratorium). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 12, 1–25.

Bradley, W. (2015). Transfer Pricing: Increasing Tension Between Multinational Firms and Tax Authorities. Accounting & Taxation, 65-73.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approcehes (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darussalam, D. S. (2013). Transfer Pricing: Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis dalam Prespektif Pajak Internasional. Jakarta: Dannary Darussalam Tax Center.

Deloitte. (2014). International Tax Review. Deloitte Development LLC.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. In Sage Publications, Inc (Issue Third Edition). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625

Misra, F. (2019). Tax Compliance: Theories, Research Development and Tax Enforcement Models. Accounting Research Journal of Sutaatmadja (ACCRUALS), 3(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.35310/accruals.v3i2.72

Mustikasari, E. (2007). Kajian Empiris Tentang Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Badan Di Perusaahaan Industri Pengolahan Di Surabaya. Simposium Nasioanal Akuntansi X, 1–41.

Nurmantu, S. (2003). Pegantar Perpajakan. Jakarta: Granit.

OECD. (2010). Transfer Pricing Guidelines.

OECD. (2017, November 21). Article of the Model Convention With Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital.

Putri, W. A. (2018). Prinsip Kewajaran dan Dokumen sebagai Penangkal Kecurangan Transfer Pricing di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1-10.

Sugiyono. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 tentang Pajak Penghasilan sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v25i1.13082