Analisis Perbandingan Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Pengguna E-Tol Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999, Fatwa DSN MUI No. 116/DSN-MUI/IX/2017, Dan PBI No. 20/6/PBI/2018

latifah nur janah

doi:10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6122

Authors

latifah nur janah Universitas Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6122

Keywords:

Comparative Anaysis, Consumer Protection, E-Tol

Abstract

The consumer is weakest part in an agreement or transaction, therefore there is a need for protection as a form of legal certainty. This research aims to explain (1) the consumers protection for e-tol cards users. (2) the comparation of consumer protection for e-tol card users reviewed from Law No. 8 of1999, MUI Fatwa No. 116 of 2017 , and Bank Indonesia Regulastion No. 20 of 2018. This research is library research. Data collection tecniques use document and record tecniques. Check the validity of data using method triangulation. The data analysis technique useis comparative analysis. The result of this study, namely (1) the decision given by the e-tol card issuing bank has an impact on the consumer protection obtained for e-tol card users. (2) there is a lack of fulfillment of cnsumerprotection principles in the provisions for the use of e-tol card issuers, namely the rights and principles of security, as well as consumer safety as seen in Law No. 8 of 1999, the security of assets as seen in the MUI Fatwa No. 116 of 2017, while in Bank Indonesia Regulastion No. 20 of 2018 consumer protection has been implemented properly.

References

Abidin, Muhammad Sofyan. (2015). Dampak Kebijakan E-money di Indonesia Sebagai Alat Sistem Pembayaran Baru. Jurnal Akuntansi Akunesa, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Aprianto Naerul Edwin Kiky. (2017). Konsep Harta dalam Tinjauan Maqashid syariah. Journal og Islamic Economics Larib. Vol. 3, No. 2.

Azhari, Fathurrahman. (2015). Qawaid Fiqhiyyqh. Banjarmasin: Lembaga Pemberdayaan Kualitas Umat (LPKU) banjarmasin.

Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. (2008). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN) MUI. (2017). Fatwa DSN-MUI No. 116/DSN-MUI/2017 Tentang Uang Elekronik. Jakarta: DSN.

Madnasir. (2011). Distribusi dalam Sistem Ekonomi Islam.Muqtasid Jurnal. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Vol. 2, No. 1.

Peraturan Bank Indonesia (PBI). (2018). PBI No. 20/6/PBI/2018 Tentang Uang Elektronik. Jakarta: PBI.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK). POJK No. 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Jasa keuangan. Jakarta: POJK.

Penjelasan Peraturan Bank Indonesia (PBI). (2018). PBI No. 20/6/PBI/2018Tentang Uang Elektronik. Jakarta: PBI

Penjelasan Undang-Undang No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. (1999). Penjelasan UU No. 20/6/PBI/2018Tentang Uang Elektronik. Jakarta: UU.

Rasyid, Abdul & Tika Andini Putri. (2019). Kewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 12, No. 2 Agustus

Suhendi. (2012). Pandangan Maqashid Syariah dalam Mencapai Kesempurnaan Konsepsi Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Iqtishaduna. Vol. 1 No. 1.

https://www.bca.co.id//id/Individu/produk/Uang-elektronik/FLAZZ. Diakses Kamis, 27 Januari 2022 Jam 09.43.

https://bri.co.id/other-term-brizzi. Diakses Kamis, 27 Januari 2022 Jam 12.04.

https://www.bankmandiri.co.id/syarat-dan-ketentuan-mandiri-e-money. Diakses Jum'at, 2 April 2021 Jam 21:20.