Seberapa Sulit Bagi Perusahaan di Indonesia Implementasi XBRL?  (Studi Eksplorasi Perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia)

Sumiyati Sumiyati; Muhammad Qomaruddin Ridwan; Khairiyansyah Khairiyansyah; Suhaidar Suhaidar

doi:10.29040/jap.v24i2.11438

Seberapa Sulit Bagi Perusahaan di Indonesia Implementasi XBRL? (Studi Eksplorasi Perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia)

Sumiyati Sumiyati, Muhammad Qomaruddin Ridwan, Khairiyansyah Khairiyansyah, Suhaidar Suhaidar

Abstract

This research aims to explore the factors that encourage and slow down the adoption of XBRL in Indonesia, which tends to be stagnant. The results of this research are important for understanding the factors that cause stagnation in XBRL adoption in Indonesia. The method used in this research is qualitative with semi-structured interviews with four sources consisting of companies, auditors, regulators and capital market practitioners. The results show that the use of XBRL in financial reporting should be mandatory for companies in Indonesia. Adopting XBRL in Indonesia is not difficult because the Stock Exchange has provided software that can be used directly, including the required modules. XBRL does not require special skills to run the software because it is easy and ready to use.

Keywords

XBRL, Adoption, Mandatory, Finance report

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abed, S. (2018). The Perception of XBRL Technology in Jordanian Context. In Research Journal of Applied Sciences (Vol. 13, Issues 1–4).

Alles, M., & Debreceny, R. (2012). The evolution and future of XBRL research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2012.03.006

Blankenship, B. L., & Blankenship, B. (2007). XBRL : Translating Accounting for Meaningful Business Analysis and Operations XBRL : Translating Accounting for Meaningful Business Analysis and Operations.

Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2011). Pengenalan XBRL dan Implementasi XBRL di BEI. April.

Chen, Y. (2010). Realizing the Full Potential of XBRL in Government: Case Studies of XBRL Implementation. IBM Center for The Business of Government.

Chen, Y. C. (2012). A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.05.009

Cordery, C. J., Fowler, C. J., & Mustafa, K. (2011). A solution looking for a problem: factors associated with the non-adoption of XBRL. Pacific Accounting Review, 23(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140581111130634

Debreceny, R. S., Chandra, A., Cheh, J. J., Guithues-Amrhein, D., Hannon, N. J., Hutchison, P. D., Janvrin, D., Jones, R. A., Lamberton, B., Lymer, A., Mascha, M., Nehmer, R., Roohani, S., Srivastava, R. P., Trabelsi, S., Tribunella, T., Trites, G., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2005). Financial Reporting in XBRL on the SEC’s EDGAR System: A Critique and Evaluation. Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2005.19.2.191

Determinants of XBRL adoption: An institutional perspective. (n.d.).

Doolin, B., & Troshani, I. (2007). Organizational Adoption of XBRL. Electronic Markets, 17(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780701503195

Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., & Mousa, R. (2013). Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK. British Accounting Review, 45(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.06.012

Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R., & Schneberger, S. L. (2012). Informations Systems Theory: Vol.2. Springer, 28(May), 461. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2

Enachi, M., & Andone, I. I. (2015). The Progress of XBRL in Europe – Projects, Users and Prospects. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20(15), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00064-7

Henderson, D., Sheetz, S. D., & Trinkle, B. S. (2012). The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2012.02.001

Holtzblatt, M., & Tschakert, N. (2011). Expanding your accounting classroom with digital video technology. Journal of Accounting Education, 29(2–3), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2011.10.003

Kim, J. W., Lim, J. H., & No, W. G. (2012). The effect of first wave mandatory XBRL reporting across the financial information environment. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-10260

Lodhia, S., & Stone, G. (2017). Integrated Reporting in an Internet and Social Media Communication Environment: Conceptual Insights. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12143

Mathematics, A. (2016). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 27(1), 1–23.

Mousa, R. (2010). PhD Mousa (Issue July).

Neuman, L., (2015). Social Research Methods: Qualitative & Quantative Approach Fifth Edition. Pearson. NY.

Oliver, D., Whymark, G., & Romm, C. (2005). Researching ERP adoption: An internet-based grounded theory approach. Online Information Review, 29(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510638052

Olivier, M., Kotze, D., Vipoopinyo, J., Chong, D., Submitted, A. T., Mousa, B. R., For, B., Of, D., Accounting, P., Caringe, A., Holm, E., Gepp, A. C. B., Ling, K., Wong, N., Wang, Z., David, J., Yu, P., Qian, S., Windows, M., … Ahmi, A. (2016). The Non-Adoption Of Xbrl By Professional And Government Organisations In New Zealand And Its Implications For Stakeholders. International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS), 33(March), 1–18.

Paper, C., Mandilas, A., Educational, T., Maditinos, D., & Educational, T. (2016). A Cross -Countr y Assessment of the Determinants of XBRLAdoption (Issue March).

Rawashdeh, A., & Selamat, M. H. (2013). Critical Success Factors Relating to the Adoption of XBRL in Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1010

Rogers, E. M. (1962). 17 - Rogers 1995 cap 6.pdf (p. 26).

Rostami, M., & Dehghan Nayeri, M. (2015). Affecting factors on xbrl adoption. Journal of Global Economics , Management and Business Research, 2(4), 171–181.

Rostami, M., & Nayeri, M. D. (2015). Investigation on XBRL Adoption Based on TOE Model. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 7(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2015/16879

Sassi, W., Ben Othman, H., & Hussainey, K. (2023). The determinants of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) adoption: a cross-country study. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00192-6

Tarafdar, M., & Vaidya, S. D. (2007). Information technology adoption and the role of organizational readiness: The case of an Indian Bank. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 9(3), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2007070103

Troshani, I., Jerram, C., & Hill, S. R. (2011). Exploring the public sector adoption of HRIS. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(3), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111118314

Troshani, I., & Rowbottom, N. (2021). Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications. Australian Accounting Review, 31(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12334

Willis, M., & Hannon, N. J. (2005). Combating Everyday Data Problems with XBRL. Strategic Finance, 87(1), 57–59..

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v24i2.11438