Studi Literatur Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen di Perusahaan Audit

Adanan Silaban; Manatap Berliana Lumban Gaol

doi:10.29040/jap.v23i2.7294

Studi Literatur Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen di Perusahaan Audit

Adanan Silaban, Manatap Berliana Lumban Gaol

Abstract

This article aims to examine the relationship between types of management control that can be used together to form a dynamic system to maintain a balance of professional-commercial objectives in audit firms. To achieve this goal, it is carried out by reviewing the literature on the influence of different management controls on auditor behavior and decision making, and adopting the framework of Merchant and Van der Stede (2017); because it allows a clear and unambiguous classification of the different control elements. In the context of the exploratory-exploitation tension, the management control literature on ambidexterity provides a theoretical basis for examining this tension in the context of auditing and it is hoped that results and value-based management control elements play an important role in managing the learning and innovation process in audit firms, where the main responsibility is to actively promoting the learning and innovation process rests with the senior auditors.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alberti, C. T., Bedard, J. C., Bik, O. & Vanstraelen, A. (2020). Audit firm culture: recent developments and trends in the literature. European Accounting Review, December 2020

Alles, M. G. (2015). Drivers of the use and facilitators and obstacles of the evolution of Big Data by the audit profession. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), h. .439-449

Andiola, L. M., Downey, D. H. dan Westermann, K. D. (2020). Examining climate and culture in audit firms: insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39 (4) h. 19-34

Bamber, E. M. dan Iyer, V. M. (2007). Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26 (2), h. 1-24

Bauer. T. D. (2015). The effects of client identity strength and professional identity salience on auditor judgments. The Accounting Review, 90(1), h. 95-114

Becharov, M. L. & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 39(3), h. 364-381

Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, h. 12-30.

Bedford, D. S. (2020). Conceptual and empirical issues in understanding management control combinations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86

Bedford, D. S., Bisbe, J. & Sweeney, B. (2019). Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, h. 21-37

Bedford, D. S. & Malmi, T. (2015). Configurations of control: an exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 27, pp. 2-26

Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T. & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: an empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, h. 12-28

Bobek, D. D., Dalton, D. W., Daugherty, B. E., Hageman, A. M. & Radtke, R. R. (2017). An investigation of ethical environments of CPAs: public accounting versus industry. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(1), h. 43–56.

Broberg, P., Umans, T., Skog, P. & Theodorsson, E. (2018). Auditors’ professional and organizational identities and commercialization in audit firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(2), h. 374-399

Buchheit, S., Pasewark, W. R. & Strawser, J. R. (2003). No need to compromise: evidence of public accounting’s changing culture regarding budgetary performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), h. 151-163

Church, B. K., Jenkins, J. G., McCracken, S. A., Roush, P. B. & Stanley, J. D. (2015). Auditor independence in fact: research, regulatory, and practice implications drawn from experimental and archival research. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), h. 217-238

Coram, P. J. & Robinson, M. J. (2017). Professionalism and performance incentives in accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), h. 103-123

Curtis, E. & Sweeney, B. (2017). Managing different types of innovation: mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), h. 313-343.

Daglienė , L. & Klovienė, L. (2019). Motivation to use Big Data and Big Data analytics in external auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34 (7), h. 750-782

Dalton, D. W., Davis, A. B. dan Viator, R. E. (2015). The joint effect of unfavorable supervisory feedback environments and external mentoring on job attitudes and job outcomes in the public accounting profession. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27(2), h. 53–76

Dennis, S. A. dan Johnstone, K. M. (2018). A natural field experiment examining the joint role of audit partner leadership and subordinates’ knowledge in fraud brainstorming. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 66, h. 14-28

Dirsmith, M. W. dan Covaleski, M. A. (1985). Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), h. 149-169

Englund, H. dan Gerdin, J. (2015). Developing enabling performance measurement systems: on the interplay between numbers and operational knowledge. European Accounting Review, 24(2), h. 277-303

Ernstberger, J., Koch, C., Schreiber, E. M. & Trompeter, G. (2020). Are audit firms’ compensation policies associated with Audit Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), h. 218-244

Fredberg, T. (2014). If I say it’s complex, it bloody well will be: CEO strategies for managing paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), pp. 171-188

Friis, I., Hansen, A. dan Vámosi, T. (2015). On the effectiveness of incentive pay: exploring complementarities and substitution between management control system elements in a manufacturing firm. European Accounting Review, 24(2), h. 241-276

Gerdin, J., Johansson, T. dan Wennblom, G. (2019). The contingent nature of complementarity between results and value-based controls for managing company-level profitability: a situational strength perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 79

Grabner, I. & Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, h. 407-419

Granlund, M. & Taipaleenmäki, J. (2005). Management control and controllership in new economy firms–a life cycle perspective. Management Accounting Research, 16, h. 21-57

Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., Proell, C. A. (2020). Friends in low places: how peer advice and expected leadership feedback affect staff auditors’ willingness to speak up. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 87

Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B. & Tremblay, M-S. (2015). On the operational reality of auditors’ independence: lessons from the field. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), h. 201-236

Guo, K. H. (2016). The institutionalization of commercialism in the accounting profession: An identity-experimentation perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), pp. 99-117

Hall, M. & Smith, D. (2009). Mentoring and turnover intentions in public accounting firms: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, pp. 695–704.

Henri, J-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, pp. 529-558

Jans, M., Alles, M. & Vasarhelyi, M. (2013). The case for process mining in auditing: sources of value added and areas of application. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14, pp. 1-20

Jenkins, J. G., Deis, D. R., Bedard, J. C. & Curtis, M. B. (2008). Accounting firm culture and governance: a research synthesis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), pp. 45-74

Jeppesen, K. K. (2007). Organizational risk in large audit firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), pp. 590-603

Johansen, T. R. & Christoffersen, J. (2017). Performance evaluations in audit firms: evaluation foci and dysfunctional behaviour. International Journal of Auditing, 21, pp. 24-37

Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B. & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), pp. 385-421

Koch, C. & Salterio, S. E. (2017). The effects of auditor affinity for client and perceived client pressure on auditor proposed adjustments. The Accounting Review, 92(5), pp. 117-142

Kraus, K., Kennergren, C. & Von Unge, A. (2017). The interplay between ideological control and formal management control systems–a case study of a non-governmental organisation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, pp. 42-59

Lander, M. W., Koene, B. A. S. & Linssen, S. N. (2013). Committed to professionalism: organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, pp. 130-148

Lewis, M. W. & Smith, W.K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), pp. 127-149

Limperg, T. (1933). De functie van den accountant en de leer van het gewekte vertrouwen. Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfshuishoudkunde, 10, pp. 193-197

Long, C. P. (2018). To control and build trust: how managers use organizational controls and trustbuilding activities to motivate subordinate cooperation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, pp. 69-91

Lövstål, E. & Jontoft, A-M. (2017). Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature review. Journal of Management Control, 28, pp. 41-79

Lukkezen, J. (2020). Commerciële druk leidt tot standaardisatie. Published in the ESB report ‘Accountants doorgelicht’ (July, 2020)

Malmi, T. & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package–opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19, pp. 287-300

Martinov-Bennie, N. & Pflugrath, G. (2009). The strength of an accounting firm’s ethical environment and the quality of auditors’ judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), pp. 237–253

McManus, L. & Subramaniam, N. (2014). Organisational and professional commitment of early career accountants: do mentoring and organisational ethical climate matter? Accounting and Finance, 54, pp. 1231–1261

McNair, C. J. (1991). Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), pp. 635-653

Meckfessel, M. D. & Sellers, D. (2017). The impact of Big 4 consulting on audit reporting lag and restatements. Managerial Auditing Journal. 32(1), pp. 19-49

Merchant, K. A. & Otley, D. (2020). Beyond the systems versus package debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86

Merchant, K. A. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (UK)

Müller-Stewens, B., Widener, S. K. & Möller, K. (2020). The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80.

Mustika, Z. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, pp. 499-523

Nehme, R. (2017). Performance evaluation of auditors: a constructive or a destructive tool of audit output. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), pp. 215-231

Otley, D. T. & Pierce, B. J. (1995). The control problem in public accounting firms: an empirical study of the impact of leadership style. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(5), pp. 405-420

Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), pp. 833-848

Pache, A-C. & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. The Academy of Management Review, 35(3), pp. 455476

Pfister, J. A. & Lukka, K. (2019). Interrelation of controls for autonomous motivation: a field study of productivity gains through pressure-induced process innovation. The Accounting Review, 94(3), pp. 345-371

Picard, C.-F., Durocher, S. & Gendron, Y. (2018). The colonization of public accounting firms by marketing expertise: processes and consequences. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), pp. 191-213

Pickerd, J. S., Summers, S. L. & Wood, D. A. (2015). An examination of how entry-level staff auditors respond to tone at the top vis-à-vis tone at the bottom. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27(1), pp. 79-98

Pierce, B. & Sweeney, B. (2004). Cost-quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13(3), pp. 415-441

Pierce, B. & Sweeney, B. (2005). Management control in audit firms–partners’ perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 16, pp. 340-370

Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, pp. 379-394

Pruijssers, J. L., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. & Van Oosterhout, J. (2020). Winning at a losing game? Side-effects of perceived tournament promotion incentives in audit firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, pp. 149-167

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (USA)

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), pp. 597-624

Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. The Academy of Management Review, 36(2), pp. 381-403

Spence, C. & Carter, C. (2014). An exploration of the professional habitus in the Big 4 accounting firms. Work, Employment & Society, 28(6), pp. 946-962

Stephenson, D. (2018). Big Data demystified. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (UK)

Sundin, H., Granlund, M. & Brown, D. A. (2010). Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European Accounting Review, 19(2), pp. 203-246

Sweeney, B. & McGarry, C. (2011). Commercial and professional audit goals: inculcation of audit seniors. International Journal of Auditing, 15, pp. 316-332

Tuomela, T-S. (2005). The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance measurement system. Management Accounting Research, 16, pp. 293-320

Van Brenk, H. & Renes, R. (2020). Haal de commerciële prikkels uit de markt voor accountantscontrole. Published in the ESB report ‘Accountants doorgelicht’ (July, 2020)

Vandenhaute, M-L., Hardies, K. & Breesch, D. (2020). Professional and commercial incentives in audit firms: evidence on partner compensation. European Accounting Review, 29(3), pp. 521-554

Van der Kolk, B., Ter Bogt, H. J. & Van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G. (2015). Constraining and facilitating management control in times of austerity; case studies in four municipal departments. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(6), pp. 934-965

Van der Kolk, B., Van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G. & Ter Bogt, H. J. (2020). How combinations of control elements create tensions and how these can be managed: an embedded case study. Management Accounting Research, 48

Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A. & Tuttle, B. M. (2015). Big Data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), pp. 381-396

Wyatt, A. R. (2004). Accounting professionalism–they just don’t get it! Accounting Horizons, 18(1), pp. 45-53

Ylinen, M. & Gullkvist, B. (2014). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Management Accounting Research, 25, pp. 93-112

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v23i2.7294