Modification of Technology Acceptance Model in Regional Development Information System

Elsya Herwiyanti; Wahyu Agus Winarno; Muhammad Miqdad

doi:10.29040/jap.v24i1.6167

Modification of Technology Acceptance Model in Regional Development Information System

Elsya Herwiyanti, Wahyu Agus Winarno, Muhammad Miqdad

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the factors that influence the acceptance of the Regional Development Information System (SIPD) using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory. Based on the TAM theory, there are two perceptions that influence behavioral intentions in accepting the use of the system, namely perceived of usefulness and perceived ease of use. Design of this research is modified among Technology Acceptance Model 3, Perceived Risk, and Trust as the predictors. The subject of the study are the users of SIPD who are employees of each department in Banyuwangi . The results of this study are expected to indicate the factors that can affect the optimization of SIPD acceptance.

Keywords

Technology Acceptance Model, SIPD, Banyuwangi, e-Government

References

AgustiningTyas, V. E., Tyasari, I., & Yogivaria, D. W. (2020). Pengaruh Good Governance, Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah, Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Lkpd) Pada Opd Kota Malang. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21067/jrma.v8i1.4458

Basahel, A., & Yamin, M. (2017). Measuring success of e-government of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Technology (Singapore), 9(3), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-017-0029-4

BPK MEMBERIKAN OPINI WAJAR TANPA PENGECUALIAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN BONDOWOSO TAHUN ANGGARAN 2020 _ BPK Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Timur. (n.d.).

Budiman, F., & Arza, F. I. (2013). PENDEKATAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL DALAM KESUKSESAN IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM INFORMASI. 1(1), 87–110.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Fakhruzzaman, M. N., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2020). Factors influencing e-government adoption in indonesia: The importance of perceived risk. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6 Special Issue), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP6/SP20201015

Fatmawati, E. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk menganalisis Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan. Iqra’: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 9(1), 1–13. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/iqra/article/view/66

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 21(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498

Junnonyang, E. (2021). Citation (APA): Junnonyang, E. (2021) Integrating TAM, Perceived Risk, Trust, Relative Advantage, Government Support, Social Influence and User Satisfaction as Predictors of Mobile Government Adoption Behavior in Thailand. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EBUSINESS and EGOVERNMENT STUDIES, 13(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijefs.202113108

Kerja, P., Terhadap, P., & Laporan, K. (2004). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Kualitas Pelatihan, dan Lama Pengalaman Kerja terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan SKPD (Mukhlisul Muzahid). 179–196.

Maulana, A., & Rosyari, F. R. (2020). JURNAL NATAPRAJA : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara Application of E-Government System As An Effort to Create A Conducive Investment Climate in Banyuwangi Regency. 08(2), 106–119.

Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Pemerintah Daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia, Nomor 65(879), 2004–2006.

Putra, R. D., & Samopa, F. (2018). Analysis of Factors Affecting The Acceptance of Surabaya E-Government Service Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 3: A Case Study of E-Lampid. 157(Miseic), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.30

Sayekti, F., & Putarta, P. (2016). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Pengujian Model Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 9(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v9i3.3075

Sriwijaya, U., Raya, J., & Indralaya, P. K. M. (2021). Perceptions of usefulness and Behaviors to Keep Using in the Implementation of Regional Management Information System Applications. 6(December), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v6i2.36031

Sudianing, N. K. (2019). Staf Pengajar Universitas Panji Sakti Singaraja Sfaf Pengajar Universitas Ganesha Singaraja 1. Locus Majalah Ilmiah FISIP, 11(2), 112–133.

Suharti & Daud Ahmad. (2020). Kementerian Dalam Negeri R. In Jakarta (Issue i, pp. 441–454). https://kemendagri.go.id/berita/baca/25888/kemendagri-gelar-rapat-sinkroninasi-dan-harmonisasi-perencanaan-dan-penganggaran-program-kegiatan-penanganan-banjir-jabodetabek

Suhendar, A. (2020). Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Bentuk Keseriusan Pemerintah Menuju Good Governance (Implementasi Undang Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008). Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 13(2), 243–251.

Terbaik, K., Kelompok, U., Inovatif, T., Pelayanan, B., Menonjol, P., Akuntabilitas, B., Inovatif, T., Lingkungan, B., Indonesia, M., Jatim, H., Penggerak, K., Indonesia, K., Jawa, P. P., Kesehatan, D., Timur, P. J., Jatim, G., Jatim, G., Publik, P., & Publik, P. (n.d.). Daftar penghargaan daerah yang diterima bupati banyuwangi.

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001

Venkatesh; Viaswanath, & Davis; Fred D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2634758.pdf

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: Integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk. Electronic Library, 35(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2015-0141

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v24i1.6167