ANALISIS PROBABILITAS GAGAL BAYAR SEBELUM DAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19 DENGAN MODEL MERTON PADA PERUSAHAAN LEASING TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

Zhafira Rory Ramadhani, Alfiana Fitri

Abstract


The COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia was officially announced by the government in March 2020. This study aims to determine the difference in the probability of default between before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Merton Model. The research approach uses a quantitative approach by testing the difference in the probability of default in leasing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Using descriptive statistical analysis, the sample processed in this study was obtained from a purposive sampling method of 10 companies that issue bonds and consistently issue quarterly reports (Q1-Q4) in 2019 and 2020. The Merton model is used to measure the probability of default in each research sample company.The results showed that there were differences in the probability of default before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Calculations using the Merton Model show that in 2019 the existing leasing sector companies have a low probability of default, even almost nil, with the exception of PT Indonesia Infrastructure Finance (IIFF) and PT Mandiri Tunas Finance (TUFI). While in 2020 the ten samples experienced spike in the probability of default, the two highest being PT Astra Sedaya Finance (ASDF) and PT Mandala Multifinance, Tbk (MFIN).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agus et al. (2014). ANALISIS PENGARUH RASIO KEUANGAN TERHADAP PROBABILITAS KEBANGKRUTAN EMPAT BANK DALAM KELOMPOK LG 45 DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. Widyariset, 17(1), 163-174.

Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.

Altig et al. (2020). ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, Working Paper 27418.

Asdriargo et al.(2012). PENGUKURAN RISIKO KREDIT HARGA OBLIGASI DENGAN PENDEKATAN MODEL STRUKTURAL KMV MERTON,JURNAL GAUSSIAN , 1(1), 11-20.

Ayomi et al. (2013). MengukurRisikoSistemik dan KeterkaitanFinansialPerbankan di Indonesia. BuletinEkonomiMoneter dan Perbankan.

Barus, A.C. dan Erick, (2016). ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI NON PERFORMING LOAN PADA BANK UMUM DI INDONESIA, JurnalWiraEkonomiMikroskil, 6(2), 113-122.

Carlo, M.A. (2014). PENGARUH RETURN ON EQUITY, DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO, DAN PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIO PADA RETURN SAHAM, E-JurnalAkuntansi Universitas Udayana, 7(1), 150-164.

Crosbie, P. and Bohn, J. (2003), Modeling Default Risk, MODELING METHODOLOGY, Moody’s KMV Company, United States.

Donaldson, G. (1961), “Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy andthe Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity”, Boston: Division of Research, Harvard School of Business Administration. Hanafi, M. (2005). ManajemenKeuangan. Edisi 2004/2005, Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Ghozali, I. (2016) AplikasiAnalisisMultivarieteDengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Edisi 8. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hadad et al. (2004), ProbabilitasKegagalanKorporasiDenganMenggunakan Model Merton, Research Paper Bank Indonesia, Biro StabilitasSistemKeuangan, DirektoratPenelitian dan PengaturanPerbankan, Jakarta.

Levy, H. dan Porat, E.L. (1995), Signaling Theory and Risk Perception: An Experimental Study, Journal of Economics and Business 1995, (47), 39-56

Malasari et al. (2020). RASIO KEUANGAN DAN KEMUNGKINAN GAGAL BAYAR DENGAN METODE KMV MERTON PADA PERUSAHAAN NON KEUANGAN DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA, DeReMa (Development of Research Management): JurnalManajemen, 15(1).

Mishkin, F.S. (2010), Over The Cliff: From the Subprime to the Global Financial Crisis, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, Working Paper 16609.

Ratih et al. (2012). PENGUKURAN PROBABILITAS KEBANGKRUTAN OBLIGASI KORPORASI DENGAN SUKU BUNGA VASICEK MODEL MERTON, JURNAL GAUSSIAN, 1(1), 113-124.

Ross et al. (2014), PengantarKeuangan Perusahaan: Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, Edisi Global Asia, PenerbitSalembaEmpat, Jakarta.

Ross, S.A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach,The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40.

Soekadi, E, 1990, Mekanisme Leasing, Galia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

Suryani&Hedryadi, (2015), MetodeRisetKuantitatif: TeoriAplikasi pada PenelitianBidangManajemen dan Ekonomi Islam. Prenadamedia, Jakarta.

Wibowo, B. (2017). METODE PENGUKURAN PROBABILITAS KEBANGKRUTAN BANK DAN ANALISIS HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN DIVERSIFIKASI SUMBER PENDAPATAN: KASUS PERBANKAN INDONESIA. Matrik: JurnalManajemen, Strategi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 11(1).

Zulaikah, Siti . (2016). Perbandingan Financial Distress Bank Syariah di Indonesia dan Bank Islam di Malaysia Sebelum dan SesudahKrisis Global 2008 Menggunakan Model Altman Z-Score, JurnalEkonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 3(11), 900-914.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jap.v22i2.3139

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, ISSN 1412-629X l E-ISSN 2579-3055

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
web analytics

pengeluaran macau